The Testing Paradox
Testing feels productive.
It provides:
- Clear numbers
- Immediate feedback
- Psychological validation
But testing is:
- High intensity
- High neural demand
- Structurally stressful
Done poorly, it becomes:
- A hidden max session
- An unplanned overload spike
- A recovery disruptor
Testing must be positioned carefully.
When to Test
The ideal time to test:
- After a deload week
- At the end of a structured block
- When fatigue is low
- When irritation is minimal
Testing mid-block under fatigue measures readiness —
not adaptation.
When Not to Test
Avoid testing when:
- Sleep has been poor
- Elbow irritation is present
- High-volume week just occurred
- You are emotionally reactive to numbers
Testing under unstable conditions produces unstable data.
Unstable data triggers unstable decisions.
Testing Frequency
Recommended intervals:
- Strength: every 4–6 weeks
- Power benchmarks: every 4–6 weeks
- Capacity tests: every 6–8 weeks
More frequent testing increases noise.
Less frequent testing reduces feedback clarity.
Balance matters.
Test as Measurement — Not Training
Testing is not a workout.
Do not:
- Add extra sets “while you’re there”
- Turn testing into volume accumulation
- Chase a personal best after fatigue appears
Once a valid number is achieved:
Stop.
The goal is clarity —
not exhaustion.
Control the Environment
Testing requires:
- Same edge
- Same angle
- Same grip
- Similar warm-up
- Similar rest intervals
Even small changes:
- Different board
- Slightly different hold
- Different chalk condition
reduce comparability.
Consistency is everything.
Avoid Metric Chasing
If testing becomes:
- An ego ritual
- A weekly obsession
- A mood determinant
It distorts training.
Remember:
Testing reveals adaptation.
It does not create it.
Progress happens between tests.
The Integration Model
Best practice:
- Build block (6–8 weeks).
- Deload (reduced volume, moderate intensity).
- Test at end of deload.
- Begin next block informed by results.
This keeps adaptation intact
while preserving measurement clarity.
What to Do After a Test
If numbers increase:
Continue trajectory.
If numbers remain stable:
Assess integration, not panic.
If numbers decrease significantly:
Review fatigue, load spikes, sleep and irritation before changing programming.
React to patterns.
Not isolated outcomes.
The Core Principle
Testing should illuminate training —
not interrupt it.
Well-timed tests clarify progress.
Poorly timed tests create noise, fatigue and overreaction.
Measure intelligently.
Train consistently.
Let adaptation accumulate quietly.